AI Video Generators Ranked: 7 Best Platforms for 2026

How We Ranked These Platforms

Here is what we focused on during testing:

Model access: Does the platform offer frontier AI video models like Google Veo, Kling, Sora, MiniMax, and Seedance?

Usability: Can someone new produce a great video without watching tutorials or configuring advanced settings?

Output quality: Are the results cinematic, smooth, and free of the usual AI artifacts?

Creative control: Does it support image-to-video, first and last frame control, reference images, and audio generation?

Pricing transparency: Is it clear how much each generation costs before you hit the button?

1. getimg.ai

getimg.ai earned the top spot because it solves the one problem every other platform struggles with: giving you access to all the best AI video models while keeping the experience effortless.

The platform supports Google Veo 3.1, Kling, MiniMax, ByteDance Seedance, Wan, Sora 2, and Runway Gen-4. That is not a limited selection. It is essentially every leading video model available, accessible from a single dashboard. You can switch between them in seconds depending on what your project demands.

The standout feature is the AI video generator, which lets you upload a starting image, write a prompt describing the motion you want, and generate a polished video clip in minutes. Several models also support uploading both a first and last frame, so you control exactly how the video begins and ends.

The reference images feature is where things get really interesting. Upload up to four images of specific people, objects, or locations and mention them in your prompt. The AI weaves them into the scene, giving you director-level control that normally requires a full production setup.

The entire workflow is three steps: prompt, upload, generate. During our testing, getimg.ai was the only platform where we consistently got usable results on the first attempt without touching any advanced settings.

One downside is that getimg.ai is a generation-first platform. If you need to trim clips, add text overlays, or stitch multiple videos into a sequence, you will need a separate editing tool. For marketers and designers producing social ads or product demos, this means one extra step in the pipeline.

Best for: Creators, marketers, and designers who want every major AI model in one place with the fastest path from image to finished video.

2. Runway

Runway is one of the original players in the AI video space, and Gen-4 Turbo keeps it among the best for professional use. Its Act-Two feature lets you record yourself acting out a scene and transfer that motion to an AI character, which is genuinely impressive for character-driven content.

The tradeoff is that Runway only offers its own proprietary models. You cannot access Veo, Kling, Seedance, or any third-party options. The interface is built for professionals, so new users should expect a learning curve. Credits also get consumed quickly on higher-quality outputs.

Best for: Professional filmmakers and animators who need precise motion control and character-driven workflows.

3. Pika

Pika has built a loyal following by focusing on creative effects rather than photorealism. The platform runs on its proprietary Pika 2.2 model with unique tools you will not find elsewhere.

Pikaffects lets you apply playful transformations like melting, inflating, or exploding objects. Pikaswaps allows you to replace specific elements within a clip. Pikaframes connects multiple clips into a seamless sequence. Output reaches 1080p, and the free plan includes watermark-free downloads.

Where Pika falls short is model variety. You are limited to Pika's own model, so comparing results across Veo, Kling, or Seedance requires a different platform.

Best for: Social media creators who want fast, effects-driven clips for TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts.

4. Krea

Krea brands itself as a complete creative suite for images, video, 3D, and real-time generation. It offers access to many of the same frontier models found on getimg.ai, including Veo 3, Kling, Sora 2, Wan, and Runway.

The model selection is excellent. But the experience of using those models is noticeably more complex. The video generation screen presents a dense wall of options: aspect ratio, duration, resolution, motion intensity, keyframe uploads, audio toggles, and model-specific parameters all appear simultaneously. For experienced users who want maximum control, this is useful. For everyone else, it creates friction.

In our testing, configuring and generating a video on Krea took significantly longer than on more streamlined platforms offering the exact same models. The results were comparable in quality, but the extra steps added to the workflow without improving the output.

Video generation is also credit-intensive. A single clip can burn through over 1,000 compute credits, which requires careful budget management.

Best for: Advanced users who want a creative suite and do not mind navigating a feature-dense interface.

5. OpenArt

OpenArt began as an AI image platform and has aggressively expanded into video. It now supports models like Kling 3.0, Veo 3, Seedance, Wan, and Pika, making its model lineup competitive with the best aggregator platforms.

The issue is the interface. OpenArt tries to serve every creative need at once, packing image generators, video tools, model training, community feeds, style presets, and dozens of sub-features into one space. Locating the image-to-video workflow means navigating past tools you did not come looking for.

During testing, the video quality from models like Kling and Veo was solid. But the time spent finding the right workflow and configuring it properly was noticeably longer than on platforms offering the same models with a cleaner layout. When the underlying AI engine is identical, the interface becomes the differentiator, and OpenArt's complexity works against it here.

It is also worth noting that commercial use of videos generated on OpenArt requires attribution and a backlink, which may not suit every professional use case.

Best for: Experimenters who enjoy exploring many different AI tools and do not mind a busier interface.

6. Leonardo AI

Leonardo AI made its name in image generation and has been expanding into video with its Motion 2.0 model and a Veo 3 integration. The platform is now owned by Canva, which brings additional design infrastructure to the table.

With Veo 3, Leonardo now shares one of the same frontier video models available on simpler platforms like getimg.ai. Motion 2.0 adds spatial understanding and camera movement control, while the Smooth Video toggle boosts frame rates for cleaner output.

The problem is that accessing these models takes more effort than it should. Video creation is split across the Library, AI Creation tool, and separate Video modals. The same model that requires three clicks on a focused platform takes several more steps here. Video feels like a secondary feature bolted onto an image-first tool rather than an integrated experience.

Token-based pricing adds another layer of confusion. Video consumes far more tokens than images, and the cost per clip is often unclear until after generation.

>Best for: Existing Leonardo users who want to animate their AI-generated images without switching platforms.

7. Freepik

Freepik is primarily a stock asset library, but its AI suite now includes a video generator with access to Veo 3, Kling 2.1, Runway Gen-4, MiniMax, PixVerse, Seedance, and more. This is largely the same lineup of frontier models you will find on getimg.ai, making the comparison especially revealing.

Despite offering the same AI engines under the hood, the Freepik experience feels heavier. The platform serves two audiences simultaneously: stock asset browsers and AI video creators. Video generation tools sit alongside millions of stock photos, templates, and mockup generators, creating a layout that can feel disjointed for anyone focused specifically on AI video.

Cost efficiency is another concern. A single 8-second video can consume over 25 credits, and users on standard plans report running through their monthly allowance after just a few generations. When you can access the same Veo 3 or Kling model on a more focused platform without burning through credits as fast, the value gap is hard to ignore.

The mobile app has also received mixed reviews, with users flagging bugs and limited video options on free tiers.

Best for: Freepik subscribers who want AI video as one part of a broader stock asset and design toolkit.

Quick Comparison Table